wrong<\/em> keyword, you’re unlikely to get organic traffic.<\/p>\n\n\n\nYou’ll spend hours researching, writing, formatting, inserting photos, etc. and the world will never read a single line of your content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All that effort for NOTHING.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I learned this lesson the hard way (after researching, writing and publishing my first 10 posts).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Those posts were not targeted – they were broad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Broad topics typically (not always) result in little to no traffic – especially for a new site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Either no one is searching those terms directly, or they are very competitive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You need a target.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Something at least a little bit more specific.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There are several keyword research tools out there, and lots of different ways to use them to unearth great keywords.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For this example, let’s go with “Block Island Beaches” <\/em><\/strong>as our keyword.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Ahrefs estimates 450 traffic potential and thinks it’s easy<\/em> to rank for (we’ll be the judge of that!).<\/p>\n\n\n\nTraffic is clearly seasonal, as evidenced by the spikes during summer months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But at this point, based on what I see surface level, this keyword is worth investigating:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nit’s getting some decent traffic<\/li>\n\n\n\n it’s potentially low competition<\/li>\n\n\n\n it’s a good article to write for Block Island (the topic I am currently covering right now for Stay New England)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nStep 2 – Search the exact keyword in Google<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Some people skip this step, which is nuts – I never write for a keyword without Googling it and analyzing page one first.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe very first thing I look for is layout – what is Google surfacing to the user?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From this very first check you can determine the type of content that Google values for this keyword.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I’m intending on writing a blog post, so if Google is ranking videos first, or a carousel of items to buy from, my content format (just a blog) may not be the best fit for this particular keyword.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maybe I should add a video, or ignore this keyword altogether, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
This step can also help you understand a bit of the search intent. What Google is surfacing IN THEORY is what most people are looking for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When I Google “Block Island Beach”, here’s what comes up:<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Google is ranking a content site at the very top – good start.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If I write a blog post, with the way Google is presenting this information in search today, I have a chance to rank at the top too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This search result page may (and will) change over time, but I’ll worry about that when it does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 3 – Check the titles and URLs of top ranking sites<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Google has gotten better at figuring out what content is about, even if you don’t use the exact keyword in the title or URL.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That said, I don’t take any chances – I always use the exact keyword in both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When your title and URL both contain the keyword, it’s hard for Google to completely<\/em> miss what you’re trying to accomplish with your content.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSome people like to get cute here and “let Google figure it out”. Not me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If I see content ranking on page one that don’t have the keyword in the URL and Title, I see that as a potential weakness and opening for me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For our keyword “Block Island Beaches”, most ranking content is doing a pretty good job of this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One thing I noticed however is that the “Block Island Beach House” is ranking high. That’s the name of a hotel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How likely is it that a searcher who types in “Block Island Beaches” to Google is intending to find the “Block Island Beach House” hotel?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Not likely! Another good sign for me…<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Step 4 – Quickly check DR of sites ranking on page one<\/h2>\n\n\n\n DR is a made up score that determines how “strong” or “authoritative” a domain is. Basically, how much does Google “trust” a site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In theory, the higher the DR, the easier it is for them to rank content, and the harder it is for you to compete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I say “in theory” because I, and many others, regularly outrank higher DR sites (there are several ways to do this that we’ll cover in a moment).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For now, we just want to quickly see the first page landscape in regards to DR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If every site ranking on page one was a DR 80 or higher, that would a bit of a red flag for me – I’ll probably have a hard time breaking through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ignoring my site for now \ud83d\ude05 , I see DR 54 at the one spot and then DR 28, 39, and 37 sites all ranking in the top 10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Another good sign…<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Step 5 – Check the freshness of content<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Google loves fresh, up-to-date content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Don’t get me wrong, just because your content is new, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily going to rank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But if a lot of the content on page one is old-ish, that’s yet another data point that suggests you have a real chance to rank!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sometimes Google provides a date in the SERPs but many times it’s missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here’s a tip to get a quick down and dirty estimate of freshness…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Type your keyword into Google and click Search. After the page loads, add this string to the end of the search page URL \u201c&as_qdr=y15<\/strong>\u201d and reload the page.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThis will add the “last index date” for each page to the SERPS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Last index date is a good rough estimate of freshness (in theory, if the content was modified recently, Google would crawl and index it again!).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When I add this string to my Google search for “Block Island Beaches” this is what I get…<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Several pages last indexed in 2017! 6 years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Another good sign…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 6 – Click into and analyze each and every site ranking on page one<\/h2>\n\n\n\n The steps above (minus the keyword research) take me about 30 seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But now comes the real work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You need to open up every site ranking on page one and review their content.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nHow many words long is it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Is it comprehensive?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Does it match user intent?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Original photos?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Usefulness?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How’s the writing overall?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The goal here is get an objective sense of the overall quality of the content ranking on the first page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ultimately the question is: “Can you do better?”.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nHere are some examples of what I found for “Block Island Beaches”:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This site was ranking #4 – here is the entire post.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
It’s 323 words total. One useless picture. And the words themselves add very little value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here’s another site that was ranking #6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It covers one beach at the top with a single photo and then lumps all over beaches on the island under “Other Beaches”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Personally leaves me wanting A LOT more.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Here’s the site that is currently ranking #1:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Actually good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It’s a list of all the beaches and a single line about what each beach is best known for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Then there’s a link out to a dedicated page that adds some more details.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Here’s what one of those dedicated pages looks like…pretty skimpy, but decent overall.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Step 7 – Bringing it all together<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Ok, so we found a keyword that was getting decent volume and appeared<\/em> to be low competition: “Block Island Beaches”.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWe then searched this exact term in Google and…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nWe checked the format that Google returns at the very top (blogs, videos, products, etc.)<\/li>\n\n\n\n We checked page one to see if the exact keyword was in titles and URLs of ranking content<\/li>\n\n\n\n We looked at the DR of each site on page one<\/li>\n\n\n\n We checked the freshness of content on page one<\/li>\n\n\n\n We clicked into each and every page ranking on the first page and assessed:\n